When we hear the word ‘science’ first thing
comes in mind is physics, mathematics, labs... but none of these truly embodies
‘science’. And if we want to come out with a specific definition of science
then again we will end with different ones.
Through
this course, César Tomé's paper proposes a definition of the word science that
has drawn my attention:
In the first place, he defines science as a «systematic
search for knowledge whose validity does not depend on a specific individual or
epoch and which is open to anyone who wants to verify their findings or
reproduce their experiments".
That means that knowledge is the target of all
scientists, whatever their research field, but that doesn’t mean that any investigation
that leads to knowledge is necessarily science.
Science it's only that process which rely on systematic research that anyone
could verify its results at any time.
Then, he added that "This research is
framed within a systemic and organized skepticism that starts from the basis
that our knowledge is based on models and that all hypotheses are false as long
as the contrary is not proven"
Meaning that every scientist should be
scientific skeptics, by subjecting any kinds of claims to a systematic
investigation using some the empirical research.
in economic sciences which is my research field
, scientific approach is fundamental at all levels , and we subject all topics
to a systematic investigation using some type of the scientific method.
Any academic discipline should be possible to be considered "science", and in doing it, research topic selection and methodological standards improve. At least this is the point of these readings.
RépondreSupprimer